Quality of randomised controlled trials

نویسنده

  • Ian Galea
چکیده

Editor—The Save European Science campaign (www.SaveEuropeanResearch.org) was launched on 9 December 2003 out of concern for the future of academic and investigator led research in Europe with the advent of the European Union clinical trials directive (see p 240). It was launched from a cancer platform but is inclusive in spirit and has already gained momentum in cardiology, dermatology, and psychiatry. The directive was written and passed after minimal consultation with interested parties in the member states. Frustration at the inevitability of its arrival in May 2004 and the lack of a process to alter its course was much discussed at medical conferences and meetings around the world last year. This concern is reflected in the fervour with which researchers from all over Europe and the world have signed the letter to MEPs on the campaign’s website. It starts, “why did the European Union decide to stop cancer research,” and by 15 January more than 2000 researchers had signed. The directive raises the bar in terms of quality and reporting standards for all research. The pharmaceutical industry has understandably accepted this as an achievable minor inconvenience. What is new is that this is now the minimum standard for all clinical research regardless of the financial backing or goal of the project. Under the directive all investigators must take on more paperwork, liability, reporting, and cost burden. Little was wrong with the processes of academic or investigator led research in the European Union in the first place. Many important medical breakthroughs in recent times have been a product of this mechanism. Several eminent American and Australasian researchers have signed the letter, with messages of support that they consider it bad news for the development of medicine if European academia is shut out. To be updated on the progress of this campaign, please sign the letter and provide an email address to receive regular reports. Brian Moulton chief executive officer Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group, 120 Pembroke Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland [email protected]

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a review of randomised controlled trials.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic disorder that is associated with significant disability and health care costs. The purpose of this paper is to review and assess published randomised controlled trials examining the clinical effectiveness of interventions for IBS for 1987-1998. A literature search was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of IBS treatments: 45 stud...

متن کامل

Review Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a review of randomised controlled trials

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic disorder that is associated with significant disability and health care costs. The purpose of this paper is to review and assess published randomised controlled trials examining the clinical eVectiveness of interventions for IBS for 1987– 1998. A literature search was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of IBS treatments: 45 stud...

متن کامل

Review Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a review of randomised controlled trials

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic disorder that is associated with significant disability and health care costs. The purpose of this paper is to review and assess published randomised controlled trials examining the clinical eVectiveness of interventions for IBS for 1987– 1998. A literature search was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of IBS treatments: 45 stud...

متن کامل

What proportion of primary psychiatric interventions are based on evidence from randomised controlled trials?

OBJECTIVES To estimate the proportion of psychiatric inpatients receiving primary interventions based on randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. DESIGN Retrospective survey. SETTING Acute adult general psychiatric ward. SUBJECTS All patients admitted to the ward during a 28 day period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary interventions were classifie...

متن کامل

Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether poor reporting of methods in randomised controlled trials reflects on poor methods. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Reports of randomised controlled trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group since its establishment in 1968. PARTICIPANTS The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Outcome measures Content of reports compared with the design featu...

متن کامل

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study.

OBJECTIVES To examine the frequency and quality of reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials. DESIGN Search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 1980 to 1997 to identify trials from all disciplines, from oncology, and from cardiovascular medicine that reported on quality of life. Assessment of abstracts from articles published from 1993 to 1996. Assessment of a sample...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004